← All Videos
MinbarLive

Eitan Newman, a 17-year-old Israeli, grills one of Apartheid Israel's most genocidal politicians on an Israeli TV program called "First Vote."

English 2:23
Gaza displacement policyForced evacuation and coercionIsraeli-Palestinian conflictAftermath of October 7 and policyPolitical accountability and youth activism
Size Color BG
Language Original HebrewCroatian

In a heated exchange on Israeli TV's 'First Vote,' teen Eitan Newman challenges a politician on Gaza displacement policy, asking what happens to residents who refuse to leave. The politician claims most Gazans want to leave and suggests coercive measures, while Newman demands clarity on what that means. The tension escalates when the politician brings up his grandson killed on October 7, but Newman insists the focus remains on future policy. The discussion ends unresolved as the politician declines further debate.

Key Points

  • A teenager publicly challenges a politician to define what 'forced displacement' means in practical terms—specifically what happens to those who refuse to leave.
  • The politician claims most Gaza residents want to leave but are prevented by Israel's own restrictions and Hamas requirements, contradicting the premise of 'voluntary' transfer.
  • When pressed on enforcement against those who refuse to leave, the politician refers to coercive methods 'by any means possible,' including historical references to cutting off water and electricity supplies.
  • Newman explicitly asks whether the politician's policy implies killing those who do not leave, forcing the politician to acknowledge the lethal implications of stated positions.
  • The politician attempts to redirect the debate by invoking personal loss (a grandson killed on October 7) rather than engaging with the specific policy questions raised.
  • Newman maintains that the discussion concerns future political decisions and governance, not justifications for past events, and refuses to accept the reframing.

Article

English

Knowledge Library reading view for this lecture

PDF Word

A 17-year-old Israeli, Eitan Newman, confronts a politician on Israeli TV about the practical and moral implications of forced displacement policies toward Gaza residents who refuse to leave, pressing for clarity on what coercive methods would actually be employed.

Summary

In this heated exchange on the Israeli TV program 'First Vote,' teenager Eitan Newman directly questions a politician about forced displacement policy regarding Gaza. Newman presses the politician to explain what would happen to Gaza residents who refuse to leave their homes—whether they would be forcibly removed, and if so, how. The politician argues that most Gazans want to leave and that Israel prevents their departure, citing Hamas permission requirements at the Allenby Bridge. However, when pushed on those who refuse to leave, he suggests coercive measures 'by any means possible.' Newman explicitly challenges the vagueness of this language, asking whether it means forcing people to leave, and what that coercion would entail. The exchange becomes increasingly tense when the politician references his grandson who died on October 7, attempting to reframe the conversation away from policy specifics. Newman refuses to be redirected, insisting the discussion concerns future political decisions, not current justifications. The dialogue ends unresolved, with the politician declining further engagement.

Key takeaways

  • A teenager publicly challenges a politician to define what 'forced displacement' means in practical terms—specifically what happens to those who refuse to leave.
  • The politician claims most Gaza residents want to leave but are prevented by Israel's own restrictions and Hamas requirements, contradicting the premise of 'voluntary' transfer.
  • When pressed on enforcement against those who refuse to leave, the politician refers to coercive methods 'by any means possible,' including historical references to cutting off water and electricity supplies.
  • Newman explicitly asks whether the politician's policy implies killing those who do not leave, forcing the politician to acknowledge the lethal implications of stated positions.
  • The politician attempts to redirect the debate by invoking personal loss (a grandson killed on October 7) rather than engaging with the specific policy questions raised.
  • Newman maintains that the discussion concerns future political decisions and governance, not justifications for past events, and refuses to accept the reframing.
  • The exchange remains unresolved, with the politician declining to provide clear answers about what enforcement of displacement would actually involve.
Topics#Gaza displacement policy#Forced evacuation and coercion#Israeli-Palestinian conflict#Aftermath of October 7 and its policy implications#Political accountability and youth activism#Humanitarian and human rights concerns

Transcript (English)

Click any row to jump to that moment in the video.

0:00 You've been thinking about this for many years.
0:02 You can call it whatever you want.
0:03 If you like: "ethnic cleansing," "transfer," "voluntary emigration"—fine, of Gaza and the territories.
0:09 So what I want to ask you is: from your perspective, what will happen to a Gazan who doesn't want to leave his home, who refuses voluntary emigration?
0:16 Will IDF soldiers load him onto a truck and throw him out?
0:18 Like, where will they take him, what will you do with him?
0:21 First of all, the vast majority want to leave.
0:24 Okay?
0:24 Who's preventing them—it's actually the opposite: the State of Israel is preventing them from leaving.
0:28 It requires them to get a permit from Hamas to cross the Allenby Bridge.
0:32 This is a crazy situation.
0:33 The vast majority want to leave.
0:35 I asked about those who don't cross.
0:36 You can understand them.
0:37 And those who don't want to leave—we need to encourage them to leave.
0:40 Why?
0:41 Because whoever doesn't leave will murder you.
0:44 But that's not what I asked.
0:45 There's nothing to do.
0:45 But that's not what I asked.
0:46 But that's what I explained.
0:47 But I asked you a different question.
0:48 We need, in one way or another, to ensure that no Gazan remains there.
0:51 But that's what I'm asking: what will you do to the Gazan?
0:53 You tried to make him leave and he doesn't want to leave.
0:56 What do you do to him?
0:57 Force him to leave.
0:57 How?
0:58 He must not remain.
0:59 What does 'force' mean?
1:00 In every possible way.
1:01 What do you mean?
1:02 The kind I mentioned yesterday.
1:03 Earlier, here's what you should have done on the first day after October 7th: shut off the water tap.
1:07 Just an example.
1:09 And whoever doesn't go—let them die as far as you're concerned?
1:10 Then it will grow.
1:11 To drink electricity, I'd have to leave.
1:13 Just an example.
1:14 I'm talking to you in a completely—
1:16 So for example, like, kill everyone.
1:20 Yeah?
1:21 Like, everyone should die?
1:22 Go and die?
1:24 Not human beings?
1:25 It's quite amazing, excuse me, that after October 7th you treat us as murderers, and that same—that same Islamic-Nazi terrorist entity as "attacked," as one that needs to defend itself from us.
1:38 Excuse me.
1:39 I'm asking about your policy, not about the current reality.
1:41 What interests me—
1:42 You're running for the Knesset.
1:43 I'm trying to understand what will happen if you're in the Knesset.
1:44 You know, I have a grandson your age.
1:49 Okay?
1:51 His brother is currently lying under a tombstone because of questions like these.
1:58 So I'm guilty of killing him?
2:00 Like, is that what you're saying?
2:01 No, I'm saying—I'm saying that the distorted worldview that sought the human rights of that—that murderous entity that attacked us on October 7th, ultimately led to that disaster that we all paid the price for.
2:15 So everyone will die.
2:16 I—
2:16 Wait, wait, no matter how many you say there are—
2:18 I suggest you also listen to the one you're asking.
2:20 Okay, but I have an answer.
2:22 I think we'll make a point.
© MinbarLive · Privacy · Terms · support@minbarlive.com